Rolnik said her, "immediate
recommendation is that the bedroom tax is abolished", citing testimonies
that led her to believe the UK was, "going
backwards in the protection and promotion of the human right to housing".
However, housing minister Grant Shapps has hit back strongly, claiming
Rolnik is biased, that her evidence is anecdotal and that she had not met with
any government officials.
Aspire has previously written
about the problems with this policy and the impact it is having on disabled
people. Grant Shapps may say that Rolnik has different political views to the
government, but this does not address the problems she, and many others, have
raised. It does not make the experiences of the hundreds of people Rolnik
interviewed, the countless people who have contacted Aspire in fear of what
will happen to them and their families, nor those surveyed by organisations
such as the Papworth
Trust, cease to exist.
There are simply not
the required numbers of smaller properties to
allow everyone deemed to be over occupying to move. This problem is compounded
for many disabled people as it is even less likely that someone will be able to
find accessible accommodation to move into. Research commissioned by Aspire found that twenty
per cent of spinal cord injured people are already being placed in care homes
after leaving hospital due to a lack of accessible housing.
Where the government have tried to
address people's concerns about the policy their response has been inadequate.
As Rolnik said, "The mechanism that they have in place to mitigate it –
the discretionary payment that they provide the councils with, it doesn't solve
anything, it's for just a couple of months, and the councils cannot count on
that on a permanent basis, they don't know if it's going to be available next
year, so it's useless." This is not to mention that research has suggested
that 3
in 10 disabled people applying for
discretionary payments have been refused them.
Aspire welcomes Rolnik's comments
and is very disappointed that instead of addressing her concerns Shapps decided
to question why a woman from Brazil, a country with their own housing issues,
was lecturing the UK. Aspire would have
hoped that Shapps realised that Rolnik was investigating on behalf of the UN
rather than the Brazilian authorities and would prefer to see the government
address the issues raised rather than just trying to shout these legitimate
concerns down.
No comments:
Post a Comment